Drawing for PIPI-MAX DER KANN WAS MACHEN!

USPTO serial 79026535

PIPI-MAX DER KANN WAS MACHEN!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3265355Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 17, 2007
Examiner
CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIPI-MAX DER KANN WAS MACHEN!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, namely, toy animals and accessories thereforeSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 23, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 2, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 3, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 23, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 18, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Nov 18, 2014REINREINSTATED—
Nov 18, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 16, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 19, 2014NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED—
Mar 19, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 10, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2014PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Jan 28, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 16, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2013CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD—
Aug 15, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2013PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Aug 7, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 16, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 16, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 16, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 14, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 1, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2007RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 17, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance