USPTO serial 79026637
SPORT IDENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3427013Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2008
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SPORT IDENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KLAUS P. STOFFEL
KLAUS P. STOFFEL LUCAS AND MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD ST.21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic instruments, namely, electronic punching and timing systems for outdoor sports, comprising: electronic portable data collectors having data exchange capability with electronic cards, electronic cards including memory chips, software; holders for electronic cards; and electronic clocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | [ Packaging articles for transport ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Organizing community sporting and cultural events | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ritter, Siegfried
- Other trademarks owned by Ritter, Siegfried
- Other trademarks owned by Ritter, Siegfried
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SPORT IDENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 6, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |