Drawing for CHARLES LAFITTE SUCCESSEUR DE LA MAISON GEORGE GOULET FONDEE EN 1834 1999

USPTO serial 79026643

CHARLES LAFITTE SUCCESSEUR DE LA MAISON GEORGE GOULET FONDEE EN 1834 1999

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3258968Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2007
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with CHARLES LAFITTE SUCCESSEUR DE LA MAISON GEORGE GOULET FONDEE EN 1834 1999?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline M. Lesser

Jacqueline M. Lesser Baker & Hostetler LLPCIRA CENTRE 12TH FL2929 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2891

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, wines, sparkling wines, wines with the protected appellation of origin ChampagneACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 3, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 29, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2013CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 6, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 22, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Aug 22, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 22, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 22, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 10, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 7, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 2, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance