Drawing for LASERTEC

USPTO serial 79026660

LASERTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3398654Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 18, 2008
Examiner
MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LASERTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Simor Moskowitz

BUNKYO-KU YAMADA KATSUSHIGEYAMADA LAW & PATENT OFFICES5-1, YUSHIMA 4-CHOME,TOKYO, 113 0034

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Confocal scanning microscopes; optical inspection apparatus for industrial use, namely, photomask and reticle inspection apparatus, LCD color filter inspection system for silicon wafers and mask blanks, and thin film transister inspection apparatus; LCD color filter and TFT defect repair systems consisting primarily of tape grinding and film thermal transfer apparatus; phase-shift mask measurement systems for photomask comprising electronic-based instruments for measuring phase shiftSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 1, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 22, 2016RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 17, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 24, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 24, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 1, 2010FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 21, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance