Drawing for SMOOZE

USPTO serial 79026688

SMOOZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3237704Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2007
Examiner
BELZER, LYDIA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SMOOZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Murphy

JOHN M. MURPHY AROCHI, MARROQUÍN & LINDNER, S.C.5802 BOB BULLOCK (LOOP 20)BUILDING C1-56YILAREDO, TX 78041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032[ Aerated water and ] non-alcoholic beverages, namely, smoothies [, soft drinks and mocktails ] ; coconut milk based fruit juices blends; fruit drinks [ ; fruit juices; syrups, non-alcoholic fruit extracts, concentrates and other preparations for making beverages, namely, smoothies, mocktails, soft drinks and sherbet ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 1, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 18, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 28, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 20, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 20, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 19, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 21, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 1, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 7, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 23, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 23, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 30, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance