Drawing for TW THINKWISE

USPTO serial 79026707

TW THINKWISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TW THINKWISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus Stephen Harris

Marcus Stephen Harris Marcus Stephen Harris LLC10 S. LaSalle StreetSuite 3500Chicago, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software used to automate and increase the productivity of the development of software applicationsABANDONED—
042Computer programming; designing, developing, writing, adapting, integrating, simplifying, implementing, installing, and performing adaptive, corrective and perfective maintenance, of computer programs and software; advice in the field of, computer software, computer programming and automatic data processing; rental of softwareABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 29, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 5, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 5, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 5, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 14, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 21, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 21, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 20, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Feb 7, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance