Drawing for ACSYS

USPTO serial 79026708

ACSYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3237706Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2007
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ACSYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thilo C. Agthe

Thilo C. Agthe WUERSCH & GERING LLP100 Wall Street, 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Laser marking, cutting, drilling, structuring, embossing, engraving and depth engraving machinesACTIVE—
009Lasers, not for medical purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 3, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 12, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 15, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 15, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 15, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 26, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance