Drawing for PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ

USPTO serial 79026711

PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3398656Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 18, 2008
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Ehard

Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Drying machines, namely, web processing equipment used in connection with continuous webs of paper, textiles, packaging materials; conveyor dryers for the food, chemical, pharmaceutical and tobacco processing industries; belt conveyors; industrial drying machinery, namely, machinery for drying fabrics, foods, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, natural fibers, synthetic fibers, tobacco, wood, veneer, textiles, leather, hay, charcoal briquettes, scouring pads, ceramics, vegetables and rubber; industrial heat treating and curing machinery, namely, machinery for heat treating and curing textiles, rubber, hosiery, and synthetic products; garnett machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Propane gas, natural gas or butane gas roasting machines; roasters for coffee beans, nuts, and seeds; heat recovery apparatus, namely, finned heat exchangers for recovering and processing waste heat from process exhaust air streams; industrial baking ovens for the food industry; industrial incinerators; industrial gaseous fluid dryers and ovens; liquefied gas type ovens for food or beverage processing; food and beverage processing machines and apparatus, namely, grills, melters, toasters, puffers, namely, industrial cooking ovens for puffing food products, coolersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 9, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 17, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 24, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 24, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 1, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2010FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 19, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 21, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 23, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 20, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 16, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 28, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 28, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 16, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 28, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2006IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Sep 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2006IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Sep 12, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance