USPTO serial 79026726
TAPERADER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3576293Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2009
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAPERADER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Compressed-air machines; milling machines; electrical wax-polishing and abrasion machines for household and industrial purposes; electrical cleaning machines and electrical cleaning apparatus, namely, for floor abrading machines laboratory cleaning machines, dry-cleaning machines, carpet-cleaning machines, surface cleaning machines using high pressure water, and floor cleaning machines; sharpening machines, namely, electric and power-operated knife-sharpeners, power-operated drill sharpeners; grinding machines; machine parts, namely, grindstones; cutting machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Surveying, measuring [, checking and supervising ] apparatus, instruments and machines for measuring, regulating and controlling the behavior of abrasion and wear of lacquer, plastic, metal, rubber, glass, concrete composite, wood, and textiles; data processors and computers for use in the field of inspection of materials and surfaces; alarm apparatuses namely, alarms for the detection of surface impurity and material variation; testing apparatuses, not for medical purposes for testing of materials and surfaces, namely, plastic, metal compression, hardness and strength, glass, wood, paint, lacquer, concrete, and stone; diagnostic apparatuses, not for medical purposes, for diagnosing properties of materials and surfaces, namely, plastic, metal compression, hardness and strength, glass, wood, rubber, paint, lacquer, concrete, and stone; material-testing and surface-testing instruments and machines, namely, cement testing machines, surface roughness testing machines, plastic testing machines, surface abrasion testing machines, metal compression, hardness and strength testing machines; precision measuring apparatuses, namely, abrasion gauges, abrasion digitizers, friction gauges and digitizers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Weinhold, Wolfgang
- Other trademarks owned by Weinhold, Wolfgang
- Other trademarks owned by Weinhold, Wolfgang
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TAPERADER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 23, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 25, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 17, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |