USPTO serial 79026744
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Non-electric coffeepots (not of precious metal); non-electric pots (not of precious metal); kettles (not of precious metal); teakettles (not of precious metal); lunch boxes; small bowls; bowls (not of precious metal); fruit cups (not of precious metal); egg cups (not of precious metal); soup bowls (not of precious metal); mugs (not of precious metal); saucers (not of precious metal); rice bowls (not of precious metal); butter dishes (not of precious metal); glasses for alcohol beverages (not of precious metal); dishes (not of precious metal); tea cups (not of precious metal); coffee cups (not of precious metal); large bowls (not of precious metal) glass bowls; glass cups; portable tableware; small earthenware jars; round jars; jars (not of precious metal); trays (not of precious mtal); mixing spoons (kitchen utensils); basins; decanters; food bootles; carboys; beverage bottles; rice boxes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |