Drawing for VITRIARES

USPTO serial 79026744

VITRIARES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITRIARES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Non-electric coffeepots (not of precious metal); non-electric pots (not of precious metal); kettles (not of precious metal); teakettles (not of precious metal); lunch boxes; small bowls; bowls (not of precious metal); fruit cups (not of precious metal); egg cups (not of precious metal); soup bowls (not of precious metal); mugs (not of precious metal); saucers (not of precious metal); rice bowls (not of precious metal); butter dishes (not of precious metal); glasses for alcohol beverages (not of precious metal); dishes (not of precious metal); tea cups (not of precious metal); coffee cups (not of precious metal); large bowls (not of precious metal) glass bowls; glass cups; portable tableware; small earthenware jars; round jars; jars (not of precious metal); trays (not of precious mtal); mixing spoons (kitchen utensils); basins; decanters; food bootles; carboys; beverage bottles; rice boxesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 9, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 25, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 2, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2006IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Oct 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2006IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Sep 12, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 10, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance