Drawing for SOUNDNITE

USPTO serial 79026767

SOUNDNITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3218329Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 13, 2007
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SOUNDNITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear

JEFFREY L. VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Filters for electro-magnetic interference suppression, namely, ground noise filters for acoustic equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 22, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 6, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 9, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 26, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 13, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 26, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 6, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance