USPTO serial 79026775
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas P. O'Connell
Thomas P. O'Connell,1026A MASSACHUSETTS AVENUEARLINGTON, MA 02476UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Cigarette cases of precious metal; cigarette holders of precious metal; cigarette pipes of precious metal; long tobacco pipes of precious metal; match holders of precious metal; ashtrays of precious metal for smokers; snuff boxes of precious metals; powder compacts of precious metal; non-electric coffee pots of precious metal; jugs of precious metal; bowls of precious metals; soup bowls of precious metals; rice bowls of precious metals; wine cups of precious metals; dishes of precious metal; coffee cups of precious metals; napkin holders of precious metal; cruets of precious metals; cabarets (trays) of precious metal; memorial cups of precious metals; needle cases of precious metal; purses of precious metal; jewel cases of precious metal; vases of precious metal; candlesticks of precious metal; key holders of precious metals; wall clocks; master clocks; stopwatches; watch cases; automobile clocks; alarm clocks; electronic clocks and watches; chronographs, namely watches; chronometers; chronoscopes; table clocks; wristwatches; pocket watches; diamonds; crystal jewelry; emerald jewelry; badges of precious metal; buckles of precious metal; belt ornaments of precious metals; pins jewelry; tie pins; medals; necklaces in the nature of jewelry; rings in the nature of jewelry; anklet in the nature of jewelry; brooches in the nature of jewelry; ornamental pins; charms in the nature of jewelry; tie clips; bracelets in the nature of jewelry; cuff links | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Vanity cases sold empty; key cases in the nature of leatherwear; diaper bags; backpacks, namely rucksacks; schoolchildren's backpacks; Boston bags; purses not of precious metal; beach bags; briefcases; suitcases; cases for credit cards; travelling bags; travelling trunks; school bags, handbags; beach umbrellas, parasols; umbrellas; umbrella covers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | School uniforms; raincoats; overcoats; knee trousers; safari suits; suits; slacks; men's suits; anoraks, not for exercise; overalls; one piece suits; infants' clothing; evening dresses; clothing jackets; work clothing, namely jerseys; jumpers in the nature of shirt fronts; blue jeans; topcoats; tuxedos; togas; two-piece suits; parkas; girdles; nightgowns; button-front aloha shirts; rompers; bathrobes; body shirts; brassieres; blouses; shower caps; underwear; drawers, in the nature of clothing; undershirts; underpants; bathing caps; swimsuits; bathing trunks; chemises; sweaters; sweat shirts; sweat pants; sports shirts; white shirt; uniforms for exercise; nightwear; clothing jerseys; vests; cardigans; camisoles; tank tops; pajamas; pantyhose; polo shirts; pullovers; Tee-shirts; neckties; leggings; ear muffs; winter gloves; boas; shoulder wraps; scarves; stockings; socks; aprons being clothing items; stockings for exercise; babies' diapers of textile; nightcaps bring clothing items; caps in the nature of headwear; turbans; top hats | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 22, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |