Drawing for DYSTAR

USPTO serial 79026793

DYSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318580Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
CHOE, KELLY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with DYSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Ehrlich

David Ehrlich Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemicals for industrial use, namely, textile additivesACTIVE—
002colorants for use in the manufacture of textiles; dyes for use in the manufacture of textiles; optical brighteners for colors for use in the manufacture of textiles; and coloring preparations for use in the manufacture of textilesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 27, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 14, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 3, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 1, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 27, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Mar 27, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 27, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 11, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 24, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 31, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 18, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 24, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance