USPTO serial 79026875
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,300
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francesco Braga
Francesco Braga PERANI & PARTNERS S.P.A.Piazza Armando Diaz 7MILANO,ITALY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, WIRE CRIMPERS, ELECTRICAL INSULATION REMOVING TOOLS, NAMELY, DIAGONAL CUTTERS, PLIERS AND WIRE STRIPPERS, CABLE AND WIRE CUTTERS, CABLE TIE TOOLS, NAMELY, PLIERS AND CUTTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | RING, FORK, ROUND AND BLADE ELECTRICAL TERMINALS; ELECTRICAL CRIMP CONNECTORS; MALE, FEMALE, PIGGYBACK, BULLET, AND SOCKET ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS; ELECTRICAL GROUND CONNECTORS; CABLE CONNECTORS, MOUNTS, JUMP LEADS AND CLAMPS; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS, TERMINALS, TERMINAL BLOCKS, AND DISTRIBUTION BLOCKS; ELECTRIC CLAMPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRIC AND ELECTROMECHANIC TOOLS, PRODUCTS AND CONNECTORS, MEASURING INSTRUMENTS, SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE IN THE ELECTRIC AND ELECTROMECHANIC FIELD ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |