Drawing for SA SENSEAIR

USPTO serial 79026877

SA SENSEAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3564769Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 20, 2009
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SA SENSEAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPONE CHASE ROADLACKENBACH SIEGEL BUILDINGSCARSDALE, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific, electrical and optical apparatus and instruments for air improvement, namely, gas sensors, gas monitors, gas meters and radio transmitters for transmitting detected gas values;apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; blank magnetic datacarriers; data processors and computersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF MEASURING THE QUALITY OF THE AIR AND GASES; ANALYSES OF THE AIR QUALITY; CONSULTATIONS REGARDING AIR ENVIRONMENT; AIR QUALITY CONTROL SERVICESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 3, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 18, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 16, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jan 16, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 15, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 20, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 19, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 14, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance