Drawing for METAPHORM

USPTO serial 79026878

METAPHORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3359937Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 25, 2007
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with METAPHORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Architectural services; design services for others in the fields of architecture, buildings, engineering, town planning and interior design; town planning, namely, urban planning; providing consultation services for all the aforesaidACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 25, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 21, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 21, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 21, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 21, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Dec 21, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance