Drawing for ICYFLEX

USPTO serial 79026887

ICYFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3307500Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ICYFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter Weissman

Peter Weissman Blank Rome LLP1825 Eye Street, NWWashington, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Central processing units and microprocessors; digital signal processors [ ; application programs for central processing units, namely, embedded operating systems, real time signal processing applications including real time audio/speech processing, real time image/video processing, real time biomedical/physiological signal processing including ECG, EEG, and EMG, real time physical signal processing including temperature, humidity, and acceleration, real time applications for running of audio/image/video media players on CPUs, real time motor control, software for radio baseband processing on CPUs, computer software for data compression, data decompression, data encryption and data decryption; systems requiring long battery life namely, presence detection and alarm systems composed of sensors, digital cameras, digital signal processors, digital signal processing software; remote control systems composed of remote control units, digital signal processors, digital signal processing software ]ACTIVE—
042[ Design and development of computer hardware and software; computer programming, computer programming of applications for processors, licensing of intellectual property. ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 7, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 29, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 26, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 15, 2016IRIVIRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 15, 2016IRIVIRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 9, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 5, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 5, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Feb 5, 2014C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 5, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 21, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 21, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 15, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 21, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 21, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance