Drawing for CRYOFLEX

USPTO serial 79026889

CRYOFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3298276Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2007
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYOFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID EHRLICH

DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Cryogenic rubber granulates for artificial turf infilling and for horse arena infillingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 5, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 6, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 6, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 22, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 18, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 18, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2009COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 26, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2008AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Dec 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 10, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance