Drawing for MAERZ

USPTO serial 79026938

MAERZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3253992Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2007
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MAERZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,046*

Plus Government fees of $2,600

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill Anderfuren

Jill Anderfuren Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP550 West Adams StreetSuite 300Chicago, IL 60661

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Industrial furnaces and parts thereof for the [ heat treatment ] * calcination * of limestone and dolomite, namely, lime kilns, high-temperature furnaces for sintering, particularly for dolomite and magnesium and for producing tabular aluminum, as well as multiple-hearth furnacesACTIVE—
037Furnace [ installation, operation, ] monitoring, [ maintenance and repair ] ; technical consultation in the field of furnace assembly, installation, maintenance, monitoring and repairACTIVE—
039[ Delivery of industrial furnaces and parts thereof for the [ heat treatment ] * calcinatin * of limestone and dolomite, namely, lime kilns, high-temperature furnaces for sintering, particularly for dolomite and magnesium and for producing tabular aluminum, as well as multiple-hearth furnaces ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Technical consulting in the [ heat treatment ] * calcination * of limestone and dolomite, in the sintering of dolomite, magnesium and tabular aluminum and in the calcination of various carbonatesACTIVE—
042Engineering, technical consulting in the field of industrial furnace operation, planning, namely, industrial furnace operation, construction drafting, technical project studies and analysis in the field of industrial furnace operationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 20, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 6, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 5, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 29, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 29, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 18, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 24, 201771AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Aug 24, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 16, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 2, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 18, 2013NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 201315AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Nov 18, 201371.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 18, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 201315AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Oct 31, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Oct 31, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2013E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Nov 18, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2009COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Sep 8, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Sep 8, 2009CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 31, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance