Drawing for HOFFMANN'S

USPTO serial 79026951

HOFFMANN'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOFFMANN'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Preparations for dental care purposes, in particular dental cement, dental cement cleaners, materials for stopping teeth, dental mastic, dental lacquer, toothpaste and other preparations for cleaning teeth, modelling wax for dental and dental technology purposes, rubber and gutta-percha for dental care purposes, dental waxesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 30, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 2, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 14, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance