USPTO serial 79026960
HALOSCENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3405635Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 2008
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- —
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with HALOSCENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith R. Obert,
Keith R. Obert, WARE FRESSOLA , MAGUIRE & BARBER LLP755 Main Street, Bldg. 5MONROE, CT 06468United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [Perfuming compositions, in the nature of essential oils, intended to perfume consumer products] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical and technological services, in the nature of technical consulting about the use, of a substance or substances capable of imparting an odor, in the formulation of consumer products, namely, cosmetics and personal care products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |