Drawing for W500

USPTO serial 79027002

W500

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with W500?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew D. Price

HASELTINE LAKE REDCLIFF QUAY120 REDCLIFF STBRISTOL BS1 6HU UNITED KINGDOM,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications apparatus and instruments, namely telephone handsets, ear pieces, hands-free sets and telephone holders; cellular telephones; mobile telephones; telephone equipment cabinets; telephone equipment racks; telephone switching units, switches and relays for telephone consoles and switchboards; audio amplifiers; telephone receivers; telephones; fax machines; display screens, namely computer display screens and display screens for telephones; electronic games programs; parts for telecommunications apparatus and instruments, namely telephone handsets, ear pieces, hands-free sets and telephone holders, cellular telephones, mobile telephones, telephone switching units, switches and relays for telephone consoles and switchboards, audio amplifiers, telephone receivers; batteries and chargers for telecommunications apparatus, namely telephone handsets, ear pieces, hands-free sets and telephone holders, cellular telephones, mobile telephones; headsets for use in relation to hands-free use of telephones; ear pieces for use in relation to hands-free use of telephones; computer keyboards and keyboards on or for use in conjunction with mobile telephones; data processing apparatus, namely data modems for high speed data transmissions; media for recording or reproduction of data, sound, images or signals, namely audio magnetic tapes, video magnetic tapes and video discs; optical or magnetic apparatus and instruments, namely eyeglasses, sunglasses and binoculars, pre-recorded audio magnetic tapes and pre-recorded video magnetic tapes; computers, computer terminals, software, namely computer programs in recorded form and fixed in electronic memory circuits, all for use in relation to telecommunication devices for electronic games, for the transmission, reproduction, receiving, accessing, searching, indexing and retrieving of games, images, music, sounds, text, movies, video and animations in the field of general entertainment, and data, for general database management, for the management and operation of wireless communication devices, for enabling and securing electronic transactions, and for the transmission, reproduction, receiving, accessing, searching, indexing and retrieving of games, images, music, sounds, text, movies, video and animations in the field of general entertainment, and data from computer or communication networks; media for data storage, namely blank smart cards, blank memory chips and blank magnetic cards; electronic organizers; multimedia terminals, namely computers and mobile telephones; electronic publications, namely, magazines, advertising, promotional material and manuals, all relating to telecommunications; cinematographic and photographic apparatus and instruments, namely still and video cameras, viewing screens and viewfinders, all adapted for use in relation to telecommunications devices; printersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 5, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 14, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 14, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 3, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2007UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance