USPTO serial 79027020
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, perfumery, perfumes, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotion; perfumery, namely deodorants for personal use, dentifrices; scented room fragrances, fragrance substances for scented room fragrance dispensers, scented waters, lavender waters, eaux de toilette; extracts of flowers namely perfumes; bases for flower perfumes, perfume oils for the home, oils for perfumes and scents, products for perfuming the atmosphere, namely perfumes; perfumes of amber; perfumery, namely musk; perfumes, namely patchouli; potpourri, namely scented wood; potpourri and perfumed incense; all of the foregoing made with mandarin | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 11, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |