Drawing for DIGIBET

USPTO serial 79027028

DIGIBET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3411795Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 15, 2008
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGIBET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey S. Molinoff

Nicole M. Meyer Dickinson Wright PLLC1875 Eye Street, N.W.Suite 1200Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software used for bookmaking, lotteries, games of chance, sports betting and other betting systems; computer-based betting terminals; computer-based betting terminals with self-service functions; totalisators; automatic gaming machines; automatic gaming machines for interactive games for use with television receivers; automatic games of chance machines for use with television receivers; automatic games of chance machines with self-service functions for use with television receivers; games of chance and betting games recorded on visual data carriers; electric and electronic control and monitoring apparatus, namely, control systems for machines, gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware, video game interactive hand held remote controls for playing electronic games, computer terminals, video lottery terminalsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
016Printed materials, namely, lists featuring betting forecasts for horse racing, dog racing, and sporting competitions, newspapers in the field of race tracksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
028Automatic and electronic gaming machines; automatic and electronic gaming machines for interactive games; automatic games of chance machines; automatic games of chance machines with self-service functions; the aforementioned goods not being adapted for use with television receiversSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Setting up, installation, maintenance, and repair of office equipment and computer hardware, namely, the setting up and maintenance of electronic lottery, bookmaking, sports betting and other betting systems and betting terminals and gaming machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Transmission of sports news and sports and betting results via radio and television, by computer or by means of other electronic transmission apparatusSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Betting services, namely, bookmaking, off-track betting facilities; betting offices, casinos and sports facilities, organization of sports events in the fields of horse racing, dog racing, team sports, Olympic sports, water sports, solo sports, adventure sports, professional sports, snow sports; publication of sports news and sport betting results via print media; rental of betting terminals, namely, those with self-service functions, totalisators, gaming machines, automatic games of chance machines with self-service functions and games of chance and betting games recorded on visual data carriersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Development of sector-specific computer software, namely, for bookmaking, race tracks, sports event organisers, lotteries, games of chance, sports betting and other betting systemsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 18, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 27, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 5, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 5, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 28, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 14, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 24, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance