USPTO serial 79027028
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey S. Molinoff
Nicole M. Meyer Dickinson Wright PLLC1875 Eye Street, N.W.Suite 1200Washington, DC 20006| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software used for bookmaking, lotteries, games of chance, sports betting and other betting systems; computer-based betting terminals; computer-based betting terminals with self-service functions; totalisators; automatic gaming machines; automatic gaming machines for interactive games for use with television receivers; automatic games of chance machines for use with television receivers; automatic games of chance machines with self-service functions for use with television receivers; games of chance and betting games recorded on visual data carriers; electric and electronic control and monitoring apparatus, namely, control systems for machines, gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware, video game interactive hand held remote controls for playing electronic games, computer terminals, video lottery terminals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, lists featuring betting forecasts for horse racing, dog racing, and sporting competitions, newspapers in the field of race tracks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Automatic and electronic gaming machines; automatic and electronic gaming machines for interactive games; automatic games of chance machines; automatic games of chance machines with self-service functions; the aforementioned goods not being adapted for use with television receivers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Setting up, installation, maintenance, and repair of office equipment and computer hardware, namely, the setting up and maintenance of electronic lottery, bookmaking, sports betting and other betting systems and betting terminals and gaming machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Transmission of sports news and sports and betting results via radio and television, by computer or by means of other electronic transmission apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Betting services, namely, bookmaking, off-track betting facilities; betting offices, casinos and sports facilities, organization of sports events in the fields of horse racing, dog racing, team sports, Olympic sports, water sports, solo sports, adventure sports, professional sports, snow sports; publication of sports news and sport betting results via print media; rental of betting terminals, namely, those with self-service functions, totalisators, gaming machines, automatic games of chance machines with self-service functions and games of chance and betting games recorded on visual data carriers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Development of sector-specific computer software, namely, for bookmaking, race tracks, sports event organisers, lotteries, games of chance, sports betting and other betting systems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |