Drawing for EZCOOL

USPTO serial 79027064

EZCOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3280191Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 14, 2007
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EZCOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyle T. Peterson

Kyle T. Peterson PATTERSON, THUENTE, SKAAR & CHRISTENSEN, P.A.4800 IDS CENTER80th South 8th StreetMinneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; computer carrying cases; personal computers; data processors cable connectors; central processing unit cooling devices in the nature of central processing unit fans; electrical power supplies; card readers, namely chip card readers, magnetic coded card readers, card readers for credit cardsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 12, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 29, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 19, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 21, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 24, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance