USPTO serial 79027065
FIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic foods for medical use; medicinal herbs in dried or preserved form, medicinal herb extracts; vitamin preparations; food supplements on an amino acid, mineral and/or trace element basis; food supplements for medical purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game, also in preserved, prepared or frozen form; preserved, dried, cooked or frozen fruit and vegetables; meat extracts; meat and fish jellies; fruit and vegetable jellies for use as bread spreads; sausage, and sausage products, namely, blood sausage; jams and marmalades; processed nuts; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; eggs, milk; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats; prepared and frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, shellfish, poultry, game, or vegetables; potato chips, potato sticks; processed fruit chips, bars, slices and blocks also containing cereal; fruit and vegetable salads | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Salad dressings, mayonnaise; coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, tapioca, sago, coffee and tea substitutes; flours; processed wheat, oats, husked barley and corn flour alone or in mixed form; pasta, in particular noodles; sweet products, namely, candies; bread, fine pastry; and confectionery chips for baking; edible fruit ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; bakery goods mixes for bread, bread rolls and fine pastry; table salt; mustard, vinegar; sauces; spices and spice mixtures; ketchup; cocoa-based beverage powder; cocoa spreads; spread containing chocolate and nuts; processed cereals; popcorn; instant muesli; cereal mixtures in the nature of cereal-based snack foods; pizzas; puddings; prepared and frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Agricultural and horticultural seeds; fresh fruit and vegetables; seeds for fruit and vegetables; natural rice for use as animal fodder, live fish, namely, mollusks and shellfish for food purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral waters, carbonated drinking waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit drinks, fruit juices and vegetable juices; syrups and other preparations for making fruit drinks; whey beverages; non-alcoholic malt beverage in liquid and powder form; shakes and drinks in the nature of isotonic drinks, in liquid and powder form | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Catering for and providing temporary housing accommodations for guests | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dirk Manthey
- Other trademarks owned by Fit for Fun Verlag GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named FIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |