Drawing for CHARMBOX

USPTO serial 79027069

CHARMBOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3359941Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 25, 2007
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHARMBOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific apparatus and instruments, namely, hardware appliance for network monitoring; computers; computer software, namely, computer software for network monitoring, information gathering, information management, information delivery, data analysis, information extraction, policy compliance, content compliance; computer hardware; computer programs, namely, computer programs for network monitoring, information gathering, information management, information delivery, data analysis, information extraction, policy compliance, content complianceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Business management; office functionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Design and development of computer hardware and softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 23, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 7, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 17, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 1, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 1, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 3, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 4, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance