Drawing for COUNTERTRACK

USPTO serial 79027077

COUNTERTRACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3453904Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 24, 2008
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COUNTERTRACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. LaBarge

Richard M. LaBarge Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP233 S. Wacker DriveSuite 6300 Sears TowerChicago, IL 60606-6357

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power transmission and gearing for machines and parts thereof; components of machines and engines and motors other than for land vehicles, namely, drive shafts, ball joints, constant velocity joints, universal joints, gears, couplings, clutches, boots and adaptors for CV joints, and parts thereof; gears and enclosed drives for industrial and agricultural machinery; gearboxes other than for land vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Power transmission and parts thereof for land vehicles; drive shafts for land vehicles; ball joints for land vehicles; constant velocity joints for land vehicles; universal joints for land vehicles; gears for land vehicles; couplings for land vehicles; clutches for land vehicles; boots and adaptors for CV joints for land vehicles; and parts thereofSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 30, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 18, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 21, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 30, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 30, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 21, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 24, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2008RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED—
Feb 13, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 18, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 18, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 18, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 18, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance