USPTO serial 79027146
PLATINUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLATINUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Aperitifs, non-alcoholic; waters (beverages); cocktails, non-alcoholic; lemonades; peanut milk (soft drink); non-alcoholic beverages; isotonic beverages; whey beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; milk of almonds (beverage); fruit nectars (non-alcoholic); orgeat; beer; powders for effervescing beverages; sarsaparilla (soft drink); syrups for lemonade; syrups for beverages; tomato juice (beverage); cider (non-alcoholic); vegetable juices (beverages); fruit juices; preparations for making aerated water; preparations for making liqueurs; preparations for making mineral water; preparations for making beverages; must; grape must (unfermented); beer wort; malt wort; pastilles for effervescing beverages; non-alcoholic fruit extracts; extracts of hops for making beer; essences for making beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Aperitifs; arak (arrack); brandy; wine; piquette; whisky; vodka; gin; digesters (liqueurs and spirits); cocktails; liqueurs; alcoholic beverages (except beer); alcoholic beverages containing fruit; spirits (beverages); distilled beverages; hydromel (mead); peppermint liqueurs; bitters; rum; sake; cider; rice alcohol; alcoholic extracts; fruit extracts (alcoholic); alcoholic essences | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Sales promotion (for others) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 23, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |