Drawing for DAMLA

USPTO serial 79027168

DAMLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3275502Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2007
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with DAMLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pina M. Campagna

Pina M. Campagna Carter, DeLuca, Farrell & Schmidt, LLP445 Broad Hollow Rd.Suite 420Melville, NY 11747

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Candy, sugar candy [ marshmallow, almond candy, candy with dried fruits, Turkish delight, namely, candy, halva, namely, candy prepared with sesame oil, caramel, cacao, chocolate, honey ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 18, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 31, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 30, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 30, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 30, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 31, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 26, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 22, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 9, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 22, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 22, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 12, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance