Drawing for GATEGIM

USPTO serial 79027179

GATEGIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GATEGIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maury M. Tepper, III (Christine S. Beaman, M. Christopher Bolen, Kathryn M. Eyster, Jack B. Hicks, Sarah Anne Keefe, Fang Liu, Jeffrey R. McFadden, C. Robert Rhodes, Randel S. Springer, Maury M. Tepper, III, Mitchell A. Tuchman)

Maury M. Tepper, III Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLCPO Box 831Raleigh, NC 27602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of disorders of the nervous system, the immune system, the cardio-vascular system including diabetes and metabolic diseases, the respiratory system, the musculoskeletal system, the genitourinary system, for the treatment of inflammatory disorders, for use in dermatology, in hematology, in oncology, in transplantation, in ophthalmology, for use in the gastroenterological areas and the prevention and treatment of ocular disorders or diseases, anti-infectives, pharmaceutical preparations treating bacterial-bases disease, antivirals, anti-biotics, antifungals, vaccines, diagnostic preparations for medical useABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 21, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 21, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2008MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 3, 2008ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 2, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance