USPTO serial 79027179
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maury M. Tepper, III (Christine S. Beaman, M. Christopher Bolen, Kathryn M. Eyster, Jack B. Hicks, Sarah Anne Keefe, Fang Liu, Jeffrey R. McFadden, C. Robert Rhodes, Randel S. Springer, Maury M. Tepper, III, Mitchell A. Tuchman)
Maury M. Tepper, III Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLCPO Box 831Raleigh, NC 27602UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of disorders of the nervous system, the immune system, the cardio-vascular system including diabetes and metabolic diseases, the respiratory system, the musculoskeletal system, the genitourinary system, for the treatment of inflammatory disorders, for use in dermatology, in hematology, in oncology, in transplantation, in ophthalmology, for use in the gastroenterological areas and the prevention and treatment of ocular disorders or diseases, anti-infectives, pharmaceutical preparations treating bacterial-bases disease, antivirals, anti-biotics, antifungals, vaccines, diagnostic preparations for medical use | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 21, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |