Drawing for LASER MAKING GOOD PRODUCTS GREAT

USPTO serial 79027194

LASER MAKING GOOD PRODUCTS GREAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3362641Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 1, 2008
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LASER MAKING GOOD PRODUCTS GREAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer accessories, namely, recordable compact disc in CD-R, CD-RW, DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD+R, DVD+RW format, and 3;5" blank floppy diskettes; computer hardware, namely, multimedia speakers, keyboard, mouse and computer cablesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
016Paper and paper labels for use with ink jet printersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 7, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 19, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 8, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 8, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 8, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 2, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance