Drawing for ARSENIC PROACTIV

USPTO serial 79027203

ARSENIC PROACTIV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3253993Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2007
Examiner
THOMAS, JANICE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARSENIC PROACTIV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Mineral substances in the nature of filtering materials in arsenic removal in the water treatment industry; reagents in the nature of minerals for the treatment and purification of water; chemicals for use in the treatment and filtering of water, namely treated residues from the alumina production process for use in the purification or rehabilitation of aqueous solutions, namely, drinking waterSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Industrial water purifying apparatus; tap-water purifying apparatus; water filtering units for commercial or industrial use; water filters; filtering units for water supply and water filtering; water treatment equipment, namely cartridge filtration units, chemical sterilization units, reverse osmosis filtration units, and ultraviolet sterilization unitsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 7, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 24, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 24, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance