USPTO serial 79027217
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Pecsenye, Alfred W. Zaher, Cindy A. Elliott, David M. Perry, Emily J. Barnhart, Bruce D. George, Sean W. Dwyer, Lisa Casey Spaniel, Megan E. Spitz, and Zachary A. Aria
D YOUNG & CO 120 HOLBORNLONDON EC1N 2DY UNITED KINGDOM,| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care preparations and products, namely, hair creams, hair lotions, shampoo; beauty care preparations and products, namely, beauty creams for body care; skin care preparations and products, namely, non-medicated skin care preparations; body care products, namely, body and beauty care preparations; cosmetics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Handbags; purses; wallets; leather and imitation leather goods, namely, leather and imitation leather wallets, purses and handbags; rucksacks; traveling bags; umbrellas | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring beauty care, hair care and cosmetic products; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, a variety of goods, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods from a hair beauty salon or by mail order, or by means of a global telecommunications network, or Internet websites; business management services; franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and operation of hair salons and beauty salons | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Hairdressing services; beauty salon services; health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 28, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 24, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |