USPTO serial 79027264
DIAMONDBRITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3352596Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2007
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DIAMONDBRITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS, NAMELY ROCK OIL PETROLEUM, SOLVENTS AND DESCALING ACIDS, ALL FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHROME, RUBBER, LEATHER, PLASTIC VINYL, FABRIC, CARPET, METALLIC AND PAINTED SURFACES IN OR ON VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Varnishes, lacquers, glazes; preparations used for the protection of vehicles against corrosion and rust | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | CLEANING PREPARATIONS FOR USE ON VEHICLES, AIRCRAFT AND MARINE CRAFT; POLISHING PREPARATIONS; LIQUID SCOURING PREPARATIONS; LIQUID ABRASIVE WAX FOR PRESERVING VEHICLES, AIRCRAFT AND MARINE CRAFT; CAR SHAMPOO, GENERAL PURPOSE ABRASIVE LIQUIDS AND POWDERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jewelultra Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Jewelultra Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Jewelultra Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named DIAMONDBRITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |