USPTO serial 79027292
UF UTIFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3376176Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 29, 2008
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UF UTIFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Perez-Guerrero
Arturo Perez-Guerrero Law Offices of Arturo Perez-GuerreroP.O. Box 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, namely, concrete construction machines, concrete paving machines, concrete placing machines and plastering machines, machine tools, namely, distributor rotors, motors, namely electric motors for machines, couplings for power transmission for machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |