USPTO serial 79027326
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Industrial chemicals, water soluble or not, for all organic water based-formulations, namely, dispersing agents, grinding agents, anti-settling agents, thickeners, viscosifiers, rheology modifiers, anti-scaling agents, thinning agents, fluidifiers, crystallization inhibitors, superplasticizers, water-reduction agent additive for cement and additives for masterbatches; chemical additives for use in the manufacture of a wide variety of goods, including as mineral or organic extenders or pigments in water-based formulations or plastic materials; chemical compounds and additives for aerating and conserving concrete and ensuring concrete workability and setting time, excluding paints and oils | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Providing information on building construction materials matters; construction management, namely, providing supervision of construction work in the materials field | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Providing treatment of materials during which materials undergo transformation and/or regeneration and/or purification, for the manufacture of minerals, body care, plastics, ceramics, detergents, cosmetics, textiles, leather, concrete, paints, adhesives, paper, inks and sealants; services provided in the course of the process of manufacturing and/or transformation of natural and/or synthetic products, namely, manufacturing services for others in the field of minerals, body care products, plastics, ceramics, detergents, cosmetics, textiles, leather, concrete, paints, adhesives, paper, inks and sealants; providing technical information and advice on the choice of materials in the field of water treatment and waste treatment; recycling of waste and trash | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Engineering; professional consulting in chemistry; drawing up of expert technical opinions with regard to chemical engineering and mineral exploitation processes; geological and oil prospecting; materials testing; providing laboratory research services in the field of chemistry; chemical analysis services; technical project studies, namely, conducting laboratory studies and chemical analyses for the use of dispersing agents, grinding agents, anti-settling agents, thickeners, viscosifiers, rheology modifiers, anti-scaling agents, thinning agents, fluidifiers, crystallization inhibitors, superplasticizers, water-reduction agent additive for cement and additives for masterbatches; chemical research; technical research, namely, providing research in the field of the manufacture of minerals, bodycare, plastics, ceramics, detergents, cosmetics, textiles, leather, concrete, paints, adhesives, paper, inks and sealants; chemical research and analysis services, namely, technical research, laboratory studies, trials and customer trials in the field of the manufacture of minerals, bodycare, plastics, ceramics, detergents, cosmetics, textiles, leather, concrete, paints, adhesives, paper, inks and sealants; research and development of new products for third parties; monitoring services, namely, testing the chemical properties of new products | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |