Drawing for W CHINA WHEEL

USPTO serial 79027345

W CHINA WHEEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with W CHINA WHEEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Alloys of common metal; aluminium; ingots of common metal; steel alloys; white metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Automobile bodies; automobile tyres; automobiles; vehicle wheel rims; vehicle wheel spokes; vehicle wheels; hubs for vehicle wheels; bands for wheel hub; vehicle wheel tyres; spokes clips for wheelsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 13, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 12, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 7, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 19, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 3, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 28, 2006CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance