USPTO serial 79027393
SIGMAFORGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3252068Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 2007
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIGMAFORGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Solingen, DE
DE
DE
DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | [ Flower shears; ] bread knives; [ non-electric can openers; non-electric egg cutters; ] table cutlery; [ non-electric fingernail polishers; ] carving forks; slicing knives; forks; [ gardener's shears; poultry shears; ] non-electric vegetable peelers; vegetable knives; [ non-electric hair cutters; ] cleavers; [ hair scissors; ] household shears; [ cuticle scissors; callus removers, namely, rasps and cutters; ] hand-operated sharpening instruments; cheese planes; cheese knives; waiter's knives; chef's knives; kitchen shears; spoons; [ manicure sets; ] knives; knife cases; knife blocks; knife sharpeners; cutlery; [ nail files; cuticle tweezers; nail clippers; non-electric nail scissors; nail nippers; nail extractors; nutcrackers, not of precious metal; pedicure sets; tweezers; ] non-electric pizza cutters; [ electric and non-electric razors; razor blades; razor knives; ] Santoku knives; peeling knives; sharpening stones; cutting knives for household and kitchen use; [ tailor's shears; ] non-electric asparagus peelers; pocket knives; sharpening steels; sharpening rods; mincing knives [ eyelash tongs, namely, eyelash curlers ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZWILLING J.A. Henckels AG
- Other trademarks owned by ZWILLING J.A. HENCKELS AG
- Other trademarks owned by ZWILLING J.A. HENCKELS AG
- Other trademarks owned by ZWILLING J.A. HENCKELS AG
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named SIGMAFORGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 17, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |