USPTO serial 79027397
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen Mollnow Walsh
Kristen Mollnow Walsh Nixon Peabody LLP1300 Clinton SquareRochester, NY 14604United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | [ CLOCKS AND WATCHES; JEWELRY, NAMELY, EARRINGS, RINGS, BRACELETS, NECKLACES ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | [ NOVELS, HISTORY BOOKS [, GAME BOOKS, ALMANACS, STATIONERY, NAMELY, LETTER PAPER, PENS, PENS, PENCILS, ERASERS, EXERCISE BOOKS, CRAYONS, NOTE PADS ] ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | [ [ SUITCASES, ] HAND BAGS [, TRAVEL BAGS, SPORT BAGS, BABY CARRYING BAGS, UMBRELLAS, PARASOLS, BACKPACKS, FELT POUCHES, PURSES, TEXTILE SHOPPING BAGS AND POUCHES, LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, LEATHER PURSES, BAGS, AND POUCHES ] ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | [ TOILET UTENSILS, NAMELY, TOILET BRUSHES, TOILET PAPER HOLDERS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATERS, PULLOVERS, PANTS, FOOTWEAR, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, HATS, HEADGEAR, NAMELY, HATS AND CAPS, SPORTS WEAR, NAMELY, SWIM WEAR, [ SKI WEAR, TENNIS WEAR, SURF WEAR, ] EXERCISE WEAR, NAMELY, SWEAT SUITS, UNDERWEAR, SCARVES, HEAD SCARVES, AND GLOVES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 8, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 7, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |