USPTO serial 79027413
GIGANOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3418487Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 29, 2008
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with GIGANOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca E. McDougall
Rebecca E. McDougall Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWAttention: TMSUWashington, DC 20004-2541Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications apparatus and instruments, namely, antennas for wireless devices [, computers, and radio telephones, mobile telephones, digital cellular telephones, wireless telephones and radio telephone handsets; [ wireless telephone handsets, wireless telephone and radio telephone receivers, wireless telephone and radio telephone transmitters and base stations for receiving and transmitting wireless signals; ] telecommunications terminals, namely, voice and data terminals for mobile telecommunications, telephones; telecommunications software, namely, software for use in antenna steering and positioning ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | [ Telecommunications services, namely, local and long distance transmission of data, video, audio, and telephony services by means of antennas, telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 10, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |