USPTO serial 79027447
AMBX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMBX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward W. Goodman, Robert J. Kraus, David L. Barnes, Michael E. Marion, Jack E. Haken
Edward W. Goodman PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATIONP.O. Box 3001Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission, or reproduction of sound and/or images and/or data, namely, sound recorders and sound play back apparatus, video/image recorders and television sets, monitors, projectors, loudspeakers, set top boxes, DVD players and recorders; integrated circuits (ICs), semiconductors and computer chips; data processing equipment, namely gaming consoles and pads, keyboards, joysticks and computers; software for processing, controlling and playing electronic games as well as for creating a real world entertainment experience with the possibility to control and change the setting of lights, audio/video, central heating; light emitting diodes (LEDs), rumble packs; gaming software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |