Drawing for IDRINX THE INNOVATIVE DRINKS COMPANY

USPTO serial 79027453

IDRINX THE INNOVATIVE DRINKS COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3340213Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDRINX THE INNOVATIVE DRINKS COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hope Hamilton

Hope Hamilton Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749ATTN: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BeerSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, wine, hard ciders, distilled spirits, and flavored brewed malt beveragesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
May 19, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 19, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 15, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 5, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 5, 2015REINREINSTATED—
May 5, 2015PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 12, 2015TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 27, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 21, 2013PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Nov 20, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 6, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 24, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance