USPTO serial 79027454
KASTAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KASTAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Rubber, gutta-percha, gum, asbestos, mica and goods made from these materials and not included in other classes; plastics in extruded form for use in manufacture; packing, stopping and insulating materials; flexible pipes, not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |