USPTO serial 79027465
PROPERTY JOURNAL JOURNAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPERSON, KENNETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROPERTY JOURNAL JOURNAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books; dictionaries; newspapers; small newspapers; comic books; periodicals; magazines; catalogues; pamphlets; prospectuses; index cards, ledgers; paper; paper items; cardboard; cardboard articles; blotting paper; paper for photocopying; articles for bookbinding and bookbinders; photographs; office requisites, adhesive materials for office use; glues for office use; art materials; artists' paintbrushes; typewriters; stapling machines for office use; metal staples; staple removers; metal tacks for staplers; punches for office use; instructional and teaching material; document folders; office binders; printing type; printing blocks; inking pads for stamps; stamps; stamp racks; date stamps; pencil sharpeners; offices supplies (except furniture); seals for office use; rubber erasers; adhesive tapes for stationery or household use; paper tapes for calculating machines; penholders; ballpoint pens; pencils; pens; chalks; letter clips; correction fluids for documents; compasses for drawing; squares and rulers for drawing; envelope sealing machines, for offices; envelopes; writing paper; carbon paper; paper cutters; cutters for office use; self-adhesive advertising labels; posters; visiting cards; diaries | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |