USPTO serial 79027483
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | BOBBINS, SPOOLS AND REELS TO FACILITATE WINDING USED IN THE PRODUCTION, PROCESSING AND TREATMENT, STORAGE AND TRANSPORT OF THREAD-SHAPED WINDING MATERIAL SUCH AS CABLE, WIRE, SOLDER WIRE, TAPE, BRAIDING; PLASTIC BOXES WITH AND WITHOUT COVERS FOR USE AS SHIPPING CONTAINERS, [ COLLECTING BOXES, ] TRANSPORT CONTAINERS, [ COMPOSTERS, END PIECES OF ROLLER SHUTTER BOXES, ] [ PRESORTING BOXES, ] [ LETTER CONTAINERS WITH OR WITHOUT COVER; ] ALL AFOREMENTIONED GOODS MADE OF PLASTICS [ ; ROLLERS WITH A HUB MADE OF PLASTICS AND A RACE OF RUBBER OR PLASTICS TO FACILITATE ROLL WINDING ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |