Drawing for YOUR PERSONAL DIAMOND

USPTO serial 79027492

YOUR PERSONAL DIAMOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3298292Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2007
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOUR PERSONAL DIAMOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN H. WEBER

JOHN H. WEBER BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE, N.W.WASHINGTON SQUARE, SUITE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Diamonds, brilliants, jewellerySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Technological services, namely, technological consultations in the field of identification of diamonds and technological consultations in the nature of spectral analysis of synthetic diamonds; research and development in the field of identification of diamondsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 5, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 2, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 2, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 14, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 7, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 7, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 2, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance