USPTO serial 79027502
FRE-O
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRE-O?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara A. Friedman
Barbara A. Friedman Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC1901 Research BoulevardSuite 400Rockville, MD 20850Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wines; sparkling wines; fortified wines; potable spirits; liqueurs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 8, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |