Drawing for THE LOVLOTS

USPTO serial 79027506

THE LOVLOTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3376177Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 29, 2008
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LOVLOTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin P. Welch

Justin P. Welch Baker & McKenzie LLP2001 Ross Avenue2300 Trammell Crow CenterDallas, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Glass wares, namely, decorative, industrially and hand-manufactured art and handcraft art objects of glass, [ ornaments, ] sculptures, figurines and animal figurines of glassSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 24, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 6, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 22, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 1, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 24, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 24, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance