USPTO serial 79027520
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE E. TOCHTROP
MICHELLE E. TOCHTROP Chrisman Gallo Tochtrop LLC629 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1101CLEVELAND, OH 44114United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for human use containing diclofenac for the local treatment of the painful and inflammatory states of a rheumatic or traumatic nature | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |